Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Methodology of the study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Hyperparameter tuning details and final configurations.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

k-Fold cross-validation setup and implementation.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlation heatmaps between actual and predicted 28-day compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths for ML models.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Model performance heat map for all models.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Correlation matrix.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Scatter plots for predicted values of train and test of CS, TS, and FS.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Plots of feature importance for CS, TS, and FS.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Box plots of CS, TS, FS vs biomedical waste ash (%).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Radar chart for train and test performance metrics.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

3D surface plots for CS, TS, and FS, respectively.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Error Analysis for all the models.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Sensitivity curve for CS, TS, and FS.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Shap analysis.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Shap value plot.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Taylor analysis for train and test values for all models.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Pareto front plot for CS, FS, and TS, respectively.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Pairwise plot for CS, FS, and TS, respectively.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 4.

External validation results.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

SI for BMWA concrete mixes.

More »

Table 5 Expand