Fig 1.
Participant flow diagram with number of included and excluded participants.
Adapted and modified, from Schaupp et al. [11], licenced under CC BY 4.0.
Table 1.
Demographics by condition.
Table 2.
Descriptive statistics across measurement points by condition.
Table 3.
Associations with road traffic noise annoyance.
Fig 2.
Estimates for noise annoyance (range 0-10), repetitive negative thinking (range 0-4), nature relatedness (range 1-5) and love and care for nature (range 1-7).
Panels B—D depict differences (delta before minus after). Positive delta repetitive negative thinking scores reflect a decrease in repetitive negative thinking; positive nature relatedness scores indicate a decrease in nature relatedness and positive love and care for nature scores depict a decrease in love and care for nature.
Table 4.
Associations with change in repetitive negative thinking.
Table 5.
Associations with change in nature relatedness.
Table 6.
Associations with change in Love and Care for Nature Scale.
Table 7.
Overview of the results of three models with different noise predictors.
Table 8.
Most frequently mentioned changes in thoughts when going for a walk.
Table 9.
Most frequently mentioned topics on how walking helps think through personal problems.