Fig 1.
Deductive illustration of the EcD_ratio.
The schematic demonstrates how the dual-bite–based registration is affected when one of the meshes (in this example, the opened-position scan) is displaced. Such displacement alters the resulting registered axis, as shown.
Fig 2.
Deductive illustration of the AEcFE.
The figure shows two different axes and the resulting misalignment of the same object when rotated around each axis. The positional difference of the axes leads to the observed discrepancy in the final location of the mesh.
Fig 3.
Schematic representation of the clinical and digital workflow, their outputs, and the relation to the different experimental setups.
Table 1.
The registered parameters of Setup-1 Szeged.
Table 2.
The different mean error and AEcFE values of all four participants divided by the amounts of rotation.
Table 3.
The different AEcFE values of the four participants.
Table 4.
The registered parameters of Setup-1 Modjaw.
Fig 4.
Orientation of the parallel error direction relative to the skull and the registered digital data.
Table 5.
The registered parameters of Setup-2.
Table 6.
Overview table of Results. Simplified overview table of the results highlighting and summarizing some of the key findings.