Table 1.
Summary of the activation subscale elements from the DEX-R based on Stuss [15].
Fig 1.
The Q-Q plot confirming the normal distribution of the activation subscale score.
Table 2.
Counts and percentages of categorical socio-demographic and possible risk factors. 1 JOD = 1.41 USD (fixed rate).
Table 3.
Mean and standard deviation of continuous socio-demographic and possible risk factors, along with total DEX-R score for activation elements.
Table 4.
Significant dichotomous and ordinal categorical variables.
Fig 2.
Dot plots of the activation score versus Area of living (1 represent rural).
The score was significantly higher for students living in urban areas.
Fig 3.
Dot plots of the activation score versus Having visited a psychiatrist/psychologist (1 represent no).
Those with prior visits had a higher score on average.
Fig 4.
Dot plots of the activation score versus Having strong relationship with extended family (1 represents no, and higher mean score).
Fig 5.
Dot plots of the activation score versus Living with parents (1 represent no, and higher mean score).
Fig 6.
Dot plots of the activation score versus Family income.
Significant differences between level 1 and 4. Level with higher income had higher score on average.
Fig 7.
Dot plots of the activation score versus GPA (1 represent <C-), 6 represent (A,A-).
Lowest GPA had significantly higher score in comparison to the two highest GPA categories.
Fig 8.
Dot plots of the activation score versus Parents divorced (1 represent no, and lower mean score).
Table 5.
Summary of significant continuous variables. x is the corresponding variable in each line.
Fig 9.
Bivariate fit of the activation score versus Number of daily hours spent on social media.
Fig 10.
Bivariate fit of the activation score versus Number of weekly times eating fast food.
Fig 11.
Bivariate fit of the activation score versus Number of daily hours using smartphone/electronic devices.
Fig 12.
Bivariate fit of the activation score versus Number of weekly hours exercising/playing sports.
Fig 13.
Bivariate fit of the activation score versus Number of social media platforms used.
Table 6.
The calculated clinical quartile limits for the activation subscale score. The minimum score was 8 and maximum was 40.
Table 7.
Clinical quartile scores distribution between groups for the activation subscale.