Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Priority areas for REDD+ in Ecuador.

Source: MAATE, 2016a.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of the stages for processing spatial data.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Landscape metrics used the Fragstat program.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Forest Area Density calculation on a 10x10 pixel map with a 3x3 pixel window.

Adapted from: (Vogt Peter, 2016).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Summary of fragmentation class ranks according to FAD result per pixel.

Adapted from (Vogt Peter, 2016).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Landscape metric Mean Patch Area (PA_MN) for the two CUS sources.

a) Data 1 MAATE and b) Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Landscape metric Number of patches (PN) for the two CUS sources.

a) Data 1 MAATE and b) Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Landscape metric Patch area density (PD) for the two CUS sources.

a) Data 1 MAATE and b) Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Landscape metric Largest Patch Index (LPI) for the two CUS sources.

a) Data 1 MAATE and b) Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Landscape metric Effective mesh size (MESH) for the two CUS sources.

a) Data 1 MAATE and b) Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of contrasting outcomes from MAATE and MapBiomas Data (1990-2022).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 10.

Nearest Mean Euclidean Distance (ENN_MN) landscape metric for the two CUS sources.

a) Data 1 MAATE and b) Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

Statistical comparison between two data sources with the Wilcoxon signed test (p-value) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 11.

Multiscale fragmentation for 1990-2022 in priority area 1 – Northern Amazon of the REDD+ program with two data sources: Data 1 MAATE and Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Change in multiscale fragmentation from 1990 to 2022 for the Northern Amazon with two sources of information: Data 1 MAATE and Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Multiscale fragmentation between 1990-2022 for priority area 2 – Central Amazon of the REDD+ program with two data sources, Data 1 MAATE and Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Change in multiscale fragmentation between 1990 and 2022 for the Central Amazon with two information sources, Data 1 MAATE and Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Multiscale fragmentation between 1990-2022 in priority area 3 – Southern Amazon of the REDD+ program with two data sources, Data 1 MAATE and Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Change in multiscale fragmentation between 1990 and 2022 for the Southern Amazon using two sources of information: Data 1 MAATE and Data 2 MapBiomas.

More »

Fig 16 Expand