Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Conceptual framework of DIF and URI.

Note: DIF includes three sub-indices (D1, D2, D3). Threshold effects are modeled for DIF, sub-indices, and traditional financial development (TF).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of key variables.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Variance inflation factor (VIF) results.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Benchmark regression results.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of DIF sub-indices.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Regression using DE as the core explanatory variable.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Robustness Tests and Instrumental Variable (IV) Estimation Results

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Threshold Effect Tests for DIF and Sub-indices

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Regime-specific coefficient estimates.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 2.

Regime-specific coefficient estimates with 95% confidence intervals.

Notes: Each point denotes the estimated coefficient; horizontal bars show 95% confidence intervals based on province-level cluster-robust standard errors. Upper regimes (e.g., DIF >4.1133, n = 19) exhibit wider intervals due to limited sample size.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Threshold effects of DIF and sub-dimensions on URI.

Notes: The red dashed vertical lines indicate estimated threshold values derived from Table 8. Blue lines represent estimated coefficients in lower and upper regimes; blue dots mark point estimates in each regime. The visible structural breaks reflect regime-dependent nonlinearities, reinforcing the presence of critical development inflection points in the DIF–URI relationship.

More »

Fig 3 Expand