Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of FF-RSS + MSE with recent approaches.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Notations used in this work.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Proposed architecture for High-dimensional data classification.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Description of 5 benchmark datasets.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance comparison of various models.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Ablation analysis on ISSBEC, model with conventional DFC, and model with conventional RFE.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Sensitivity Analysis.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

ROC Analysis for ISSBEC and Conventional Methods while using datasets a) Alizadeh2000-v1.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

ROC Analysis for ISSBEC and Conventional Methods while using datasets b) Armstrong2002-v1.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

ROC Analysis for ISSBEC and Conventional Methods while using datasets c) Chowdary2006.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

ROC Analysis for ISSBEC and Conventional Methods while using datasets d) Golub1999-v1.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

ROC Analysis for ISSBEC and Conventional Methods while using datasets e) Gordon2002.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 6.

Friedman test analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Wilcoxon test analysis.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Performance comparison in terms of accuracy while using multi-class label datasets.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Time complexity comparison of non-Spark and Spark-based ISSBEC framework.

More »

Table 9 Expand