Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Passenger flow of Chongqing Rail Transit Line 3.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Vehicle braking mode, (A)absolute distance braking mode, ADBM, (B)relative distance braking mode, RDBM.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Classification comparison of research related to virtual coupling (VC).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Virtual coupling (VC) model for rail transit.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The VC process state flow of MRT vehicles.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

MRT vehicles entry coupling scene.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

MRT vehicles acceleration coupling scene.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

MRT vehicles deceleration coupling scene.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

MRT vehicles exit the decoupling scene.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Passive decoupling scene with excessively long spacing.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Active disconnection scene with insufficient spacing.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Collision avoidance diagram for MRT vehicles in VC mode.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

The scene of a collision involving MRT vehicles accelerating out of the station.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

The scene of a collision involving MRT vehicles accelerating out of the station.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

The scene where MRT vehicles collide with an obstacle during operation.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Architecture of a virtual connected distributed model predictive control algorithm.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Architecture of the collision avoidance active model predictive control algorithm.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 2.

Initial conditions for the in-station coupling scene.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 17.

Simulation results of the station entry coupling process, (A) speed variations, (B) displacement variations.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 3.

Initial conditions for the accelerated coupling scenario.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 18.

Simulation results of the accelerated coupling process, (A) speed variations, (B) displacement variations.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 4.

Initial conditions for deceleration coupling scenarios.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 19.

Simulation results of the deceleration coupling process, (A) speed variations, (B) displacement variations.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Schematic diagram for setting the safety distance of the virtual formation MRT vehicles' collision avoidance system.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Curve of braking and parking speed and distance of MRT vehicles, (A) braking stop speed curve, (B) braking stop distance curve.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Table 5.

Initial Conditions for Accelerating Exit Collision Avoidance Scenarios.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 22.

MRT vehicles' acceleration exit collision avoidance process (empty vehicle status), (A) velocity curve, (B) distance curve.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Change in distance between trains during the collision avoidance process (empty vehicle status), (A) leading vehicle-following vehicle 1 spacing, (B) following vehicle 1-following vehicle 2 spacing.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

MRT vehicles' acceleration and exit collision avoidance process (passenger state), (A) velocity curve, (B) distance curve.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Change in distance between trains during the collision avoidance process (passenger state), (A) leading vehicle-following vehicle 1 spacing, (B) following vehicle 1-following vehicle 2 spacing.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Table 6.

Initial conditions for deceleration entry Collision Avoidance Scenarios.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 26.

MRT vehicles deceleration enter the collision avoidance process (empty vehicle status), (A) velocity curve, (B) distance curve.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Fig 27.

Change in distance between trains during the collision avoidance process (empty vehicle status), (A) leading vehicle-following vehicle 1 spacing, (B) following vehicle 1-following vehicle 2 spacing.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Fig 28.

MRT vehicles' acceleration enter collision avoidance process (passenger state), (A) velocity curve, (B) distance curve.

More »

Fig 28 Expand

Fig 29.

Change in distance between trains during the collision avoidance process (passenger state), (A) leading vehicle-following vehicle 1 spacing, (B) following vehicle 1-following vehicle 2 spacing.

More »

Fig 29 Expand

Table 7.

Initial Conditions for Obstacle Avoidance Scenarios.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 30.

The process of avoiding collisions of MRT vehicles encountering obstacles (empty vehicle state), (A) velocity curve, (B) distance curve.

More »

Fig 30 Expand

Fig 31.

Changes in the distance between trains during collision avoidance (empty vehicle state), (A) leading vehicle-following vehicle 1 spacing, (B) following vehicle 1-following vehicle 2 spacing.

More »

Fig 31 Expand

Fig 32.

The process of avoiding collisions of MRT vehicles encountering obstacles (passenger state), (A) velocity curve, (B) distance curve.

More »

Fig 32 Expand

Fig 33.

Changes in the distance between trains during collision avoidance (passenger state), (A) leading vehicle-following vehicle 1 spacing, (B) following vehicle 1-following vehicle 2 spacing.

More »

Fig 33 Expand