Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

State-of-the-art vehicle driving scenarios [1719].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Abstract-level overview of ECE-VDTDA system.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Applications of vehicle detection.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Research methodology of ECE-VDTDA system.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU anchor boxes grouped by detection layer, stride, and object size (input size 640×640).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Architectural diagram of SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU vehicle detection algorithm.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Bounding boxes and intersection over union with central points (Red) and smallest enclosing box (blue) [22].

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Vehicle detection and tracking in the ECE-VDTDA system.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Flow chart of the ECE-VDTDA system.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Threshold levels and warnings/alerts for vehicle speed, distance, and TTC estimations in the ECE-VDTDA system.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

FD, DAWN, and FC datasets class-wise labels distribution.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance (accuracy) of baseline YOLO-V5s and SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU on the FD, DAWN, and FC datasets.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance (speed) of the baseline YOLO-V5s and SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU on the FD, DAWN, and FC datasets.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance of SOTA and SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU on FD dataset.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance (speed) of SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU with SOTA on the FD dataset.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance of state-of-the-art and SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU on DAWN dataset.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance (speed) of SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU with state-of-the-art on the DAWN dataset.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 9.

Visual comparison of vehicle detection performance of baseline YOLO-V5s and optimized SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU on set-I.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Visual comparison of vehicle detection performance of baseline YOLO-V5s and optimized SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU on set-II.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Loss, P, R, and mAP graphs of SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU on FD, DAWN, FC datasets.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 10.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance (accuracy) of SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU with state-of-the-art SimYOLO-V5s variants on the FC dataset.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Comparison of vehicle detection performance (speed) of SimYOLO-V5s_WIOU with state-of-the-art SimYOLO-V5s variants on the FC dataset.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Comparison of vehicle detection and tracking performance of the ECE-VDT system with SOTA on the BDD100K video sequence of 1213 frames.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Comparison of vehicle detection and tracking performance of the ECE-VDT system with SOTA on the BDD100K video sequence of 1213 frames.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

Comparison of vehicle detection and tracking performance of the ECE-VDT system with SOTA on the self video sequence of 10213 frames.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Fig 12.

Visualization of Vehicle detection and tracking performance of ECE-VDTDA system.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Comparative analysis of processing time, FPS, distance(m)-TTC(s), and speed(km/h)-TTC(s) alerts on web, BDD100K, and self-collected diverse weather datasets for collision avoidance and driver assistance.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Visual comparison of distance(m)-TTC(s) and speed(km/h)-TTC estimations and alerts on web, BDD100K, and self-collected diverse weather datasets for collision avoidance and driver assistance.

More »

Fig 14 Expand