Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Algorithm performance across models (nested cross-validation).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Algorithm performance comparison: classification vs. ranking.

The bar chart contrasts F1-scores and Capture Rates at Top 20% across five algorithms (LightGBM, Logistic Regression, SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Gains chart performance by evaluation threshold (OOB bootstrap, n = 1000).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Ranking efficiency and stability across thresholds.

(A) Cumulative gains curve with 95% OOB bootstrap CI and random selection baseline; (B) lift factor by evaluation threshold; (C) bootstrap distributions for Top 5% and Top 20% capture rates; (D) efficiency-coverage trade-off with the Top 20% threshold highlighted.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Feature importance consensus for goal scoring prediction.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Feature importance consensus: process-oriented metrics vs. controls.

The bar chart displays the top 15 features ranked by multi-method consensus score on a log scale. Bars are color-coded by category, and annotations highlight dominant predictors such as Attempts at Goal, Total Offers, and Top Speed.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Tactical category importance analysis.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Position-specific top 5 performance factors for goal scoring (LightGBM).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Operational efficiency by evaluation threshold (OOB Bootstrap, n = 1000).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Scouting efficiency (OOB Bootstrap Mean, n = 1000).

More »

Table 7 Expand