Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Topographic map of the Tell Zurghul/Nigin site with the indication of surveyed and excavated areas.

Mound A has been investigated in several operations (Area A, D, and E); Mound B has been investigated in one operation named Area B. Reprinted from [46] under a CC BY license.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Geological map of Iraq.

Reprinted from [54] under a CC BY license.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Tell Zurghul/Nigin real climatic conditions, mean values from years 2021-2011-2001.

Data from the WorldClim database at https://worldclim.org/; S1 Fig for further information).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

ID samples, provenience, archaeological phasing, and dating.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Graphic documentation of the excavation areas.

A) Area B: reconstructed section of the excavation at the top of the mound (APs 1–3); B) Area B: reconstructed section of Step Trench excavation in 2021 (APs 4–6); C) Area E: plan of the 2022 excavation season. Reprinted from [46] under a CC BY license.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Photographic documentation of the excavation areas.

A) Area B: aerial view of the excavation at the top of the mound (APs 1–3); B) Area B: detail of adobe wall remains at the top of the mound (APs 1–3); C) Area B: picture of the Step Trench excavation in 2021 (APs 4–6), from south-west; D) Area E: aerial view of W.458; E) detail of the inner face of W.458 entering the excavation section.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Adobe brick samples (photos) for each autoptic group (1–6).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Distribution of samples across autoptic groups.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Chemical composition of the 30 studied samples by means of X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF). The oxide content is given in (%).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) carried out on the XRF data.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 4.

Mineralogical composition of the 30 studied samples obtained by qualitative Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 8.

X-ray Diffraction patterns of 10 samples with indication of the main mineral phases identified.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 5.

Petrographic characteristics of samples from archaeological context based on polarized optical microscopy analysis.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 9.

Selection of the polarised optical microscopy (POM) images.

Three representative samples (nos. 62, 54, 68, respectively) under plane-polarized light (A, B, C) and cross-polarized light (D, E, F).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Chromatic parameters of the 30 analysed samples.

A) L* (mean); B) a*-b* (mean).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Surface compactness and strength graphs. A) Scotch Tape test plot; B) Surface Hardness test plot.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Rain resistance test.ΔM (mass), ΔV (volume) and Δρ (density) modification through cycles.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Rain resistance test.

Result visualisation.

More »

Fig 13 Expand