Fig 1.
The Double Diamond Framework demonstrating the monitoring system design process, adapted from The Design Council [34].
Table 1.
Survey Participants Characteristics.
Fig 2.
Qualitative Data Analysis Process Chart.
Qualitative data analysis process chart informed by the six steps of reflexive thematic analysis, Braun & Clarke [43].
Fig 3.
Athlete (n = 53) Health and Wellbeing States.
Pie chart showing athlete survey response relating to their current health and wellbeing states (percentages).
Fig 4.
Athlete (n = 53) rating of the importance of monitoring Health and Wellbeing as part of their athletics training.
Pie chart showing athlete survey response relating to rating of the importance of monitoring HWB as part of their athletics training.
Fig 5.
HWB items ranked in order of importance at Youth Talent Programme athlete population level.
Bar chart showing survey response (population level) ranking health and wellbeing items in order of importance (summed scores).
Fig 6.
Training information recorded by athletes.
Bar chart representing key information recorded by participants who keep a training diary (n = 20) in percentages. Athletes selected multiple options thus each item represents a population percentage.
Fig 7.
Athlete reasons for monitoring health and wellbeing.
Bar chart representing athletes’ reasons for monitoring health and wellbeing (n = 29). Athletes selected multiple option thus each item represents a population percentage.
Fig 8.
Thematic network map illustrating themes, subthemes, and the interrelationship between each theme (demonstrated by the multi directional arrows).
Table 2.
Subthemes and illustrative quotes relating to Theme 1: education as a pathway to athlete autonomy and wellbeing.
Table 3.
Subthemes and illustrative quotes relating to Theme 2: Holistic HWB perspectives.
Table 4.
Subthemes and illustrative quotes relating to Theme 3: Factors that influence adoption.
Table 5.
Subthemes and illustrative quotes relating to Theme 4: Monitoring Practices.