Fig 1.
(a) , (b)
, (c)
.
Fig 2.
(a) , (b)
, (c)
, (d)
, (e)
(with TA expansion).
Fig 3.
(i) indicates the ith most recent position where M with flag = 1 was transmitted.
Fig 4.
Lattice road network.
Fig 5.
Problem where TA does not shrink.
Fig 6.
Simulation model.
Fig 7.
Uneven node density.
Fig 8.
Characteristics of .
Fig 9.
and
for the conventional IF and (AR-2d)+(DC-2d-i) for BF1 to BF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 10.
Time variation of the mean size of TA for BF1 to BF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 11.
Time variation of for BF1 to BF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 12.
Time variation of for BF1 to BF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Table 1.
and
over the entire simulation for BF1 to BF5.
Fig 13.
,
, and
for (AR-2d)+(DC-2d-i) with BF1 to BF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 14.
and
for the conventional IF and (AR-2d)+(DC-2d-i) for AF1 to AF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 15.
Time variation of the mean size of TA for AF1 to AF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 16.
Time variation of for AF1 to AF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 17.
Time variation of for AF1 to AF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 18.
,
, and
for (AR-2d)+(DC-2d-i) with AF1 to AF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Fig 19.
Time variation of the mean size of TA for each factor of AF1 to AF5.
(a) Pattern 1, (b) Pattern 2.
Table 2.
List of acronyms.
Table 3.
Equations of .