Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic diagram of the drying system used in this study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Uncertainties and Errors During the Experiment.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Anova results for the effect of thickness and temperature on drying time.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Mean comparison of drying time under different drying treatments.

The letters show significant difference at P-value < 0.01.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Moisture Content of Drying Samples at 50°C for Various Slice Thicknesses.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Moisture Content of Drying Samples at 60°C for Various Slice Thicknesses.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Moisture Content of Drying Samples at 70°C for Various Slice Thicknesses.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Drying Times for Various Experiments.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Anova results for the effect of temperature and thickness on shrinkage.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Mean comparison of shrinkage under different drying treatments.

The letters show significant difference at P-value < 0.01.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Shrinkage Variations with Slice Thickness and Drying Temperature.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Comparison of Experimental and Predicted Shrinkage Values.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Moisture Diffusivity of Apple Slices at Different Temperatures and Thicknesses.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison of Predicted and Experimental Moisture Diffusivity Values.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 4.

Anova results for the effect of temperature and thickness on color change.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Average values of L*, a*, and b* color parameters of apple slices before and after drying under different drying treatments.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 12.

Color Changes for Different Drying Conditions.

The letters show significant difference at P-value < 0.01.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Mesh size versus error of moisture content estimation.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Comparison Between Measured and Predicted Moisture Content for Different Experiments.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 6.

Statistical comparison of experimental and modeled drying data.

More »

Table 6 Expand