Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Participant characteristics (N = 846).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Means, standard deviations, and correlations of all variables in this study (N = 846).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Results of model fitting for latent profile analysis of mothers’ parenting stress.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Profiles of mothers’ parenting stress.

Indicator means are shown as z-scores across three dimensions: parental distress, parent–child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child. Profiles: I = low-stress type; II = middle stress–low interaction disorder type; III = middle-stress type; IV = high-stress type.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Differences in adolescent problem behavior across mothers’ parenting stress profiles.

Notes: Boxes indicate the interquartile range with the median; whiskers indicate the range excluding outliers. ***p < 0.001. Profiles: I = low-stress type; II = middle stress–low interaction disorder type; III = middle-stress type; IV = high-stress type.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Results of regression analysis of mothers’ parenting stress latent profiles and adolescent problem behavior scores.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Multiple mediator model test results for adolescent problem behavior.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 3.

Mediated pathways linking mothers’ parenting stress profiles, work–family conflict, and adolescent problem behavior.

Notes: Solid lines indicate significant paths; dashed lines indicate nonsignificant paths. Values on paths are standardized regression coefficients (β). The low-stress type served as the reference group. Models were adjusted for adolescent gender, number of children in the family, maternal age, mothers’ educational level, and working hours. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

More »

Fig 3 Expand