Table 1.
Sociodemographic characteristics of participants.
Fig 1.
Study design and procedure overview.
Table 2.
Word categories for measuring linguistic style matching.
Table 3.
Example words of LIWC clout and authenticity composite measures.
Table 4.
(A-1) Groupwise analysis of linguistic style matching: Analysis Model 1. (A-2) Pairwise analysis of linguistic style matching: Analysis Model 1.
Fig 2.
(A) Analysis Model 1—Changes of participants’ LSM.
(B) Analysis Model 2—The newcomer’s influences on changes of participants’ LSM. (C) Analysis Model 3—Impact of newcomer’s presence on participants’ LSM Post-arrival.
Table 5.
(B-1) Groupwise analysis of linguistic style matching: Analysis Model 2. (B-2) Pairwise analysis of linguistic style matching: Analysis Model 2.
Table 6.
(C-1) Groupwise analysis of linguistic style matching: Analysis Model 3. (C-2) Pairwise analysis of linguistic style matching: Analysis Model 3.
Table 7.
(A) Analysis Model 1 of mistakes and filler words. (B) Analysis Model 2 of mistakes and filler words.
Table 8.
(A) Analysis Model 1 of speech clout and authenticity. (B) Analysis Model 2 of speech clout and authenticity.
Fig 3.
Conceptual model of positive affect.
Table 9.
Positive affect predicts post-newcomer interaction quality.