Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Mechanical and physical properties of the test soil.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Particle size distribution of the test soil.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

X-ray diffraction spectra of the tested GRS specimens.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic of moisture content changes in wet – dry cycles.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Equipment and specimens in MIP test.

(a) Mercury porosimeter (b) Vacuum freeze drier (c) Freeze-dried specimens.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Equipment used in SWCC test.

(a) GEO-Experts pressure plate system (b) Insulated box in FPM (c) Equipment used in VEM.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Cumulative pore volume curve of the sample.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Pore size distribution (PSD).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Matric suction measured of GRS at different wet-dry cycles.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Fitting results of the SWCC for GRS in different wet-dry cycles based Li model.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Relationship between fitting parameters of SWCC for GRS and wet-dry cycles.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Saturated permeability coefficient curve of GRS.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Effect of different step lengths on permeability coefficient of GRS.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Unsaturated permeability coefficient curve of GRS.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Relationship between unsaturated permeability coefficient and saturation of GRS.

More »

Fig 13 Expand