Fig 1.
Merge-YOLO network architecture.
Fig 2.
WT-C3k2 module and C3k2 module structure.
Fig 3.
DySample dynamic point sampler.
Table 1.
Configurations related to this experiment.
Fig 4.
Illustrations of various defects (from left to right: tears, scratches, and damage).
Table 2.
comparative test results.
Table 3.
Detection results of the improved and original algorithms on different types of defects.
Fig 5.
Visual comparison of Merge-YOLO and YOLOv11.
Fig 6.
Comparison of Merge-YOLO and YOLOv11 with amplified defects.
Table 4.
Ablation experiments were conducted to analyze the effectiveness of the different improvement strategies in this paper.