Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

EV drive system under consideration.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of the drive cycles.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

ECE-15 drive cycle [31].

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

IM240 drive cycle [42].

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forces affecting the total force of an electric vehicle.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The proposed adaptive PI-ANN controller.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Flowchart Proposed Adaptive PI Control Algorithm.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Flowchart of the TSO algorithm.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

Electric vehicle parameters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

5-Table 4Table 5ph IPMSM parameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Speed response comparison between the PI-offline tuning using TSO and PI-online tuning using MLP-ANN when the ECE-15 drive cycle is used.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Speed response comparison between the PI-offline tuning using TSO and PI-online tuning using MLP-ANN when the custom IM240 drive cycle is used.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 8.

The reference and actual motor speeds for the ECE-15 drive cycle when offline and online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The reference and actual motor speeds for the custom IM240 drive cycle when offline and online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

The reference and actual motor torque for the ECE-15 drive cycle when the offline and online PI tuning methods are used.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

The reference and actual motor torque for the custom IM240 drive cycle when the offline and online PI tuning methods are used.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

The motor currents for the ECE-15 drive cycles when (a) offline and (b) online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

The motor currents for the custom IM240 drive cycle when (a) offline and (b) online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

The motor currents THDs for the ECE-15 drive cycles when (a) offline and (b) online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

The motor currents THDs for the custom IM240 drive cycles when (a) offline and (b) online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 6.

Energy saving comparison between the offline and ANN online tuning for the two drive cycles.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 16.

The required and actual EV energy consumed for the ECE-15 drive cycles when offline and online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

The required and actual EV energy consumed for the custom IM240 drive cycles when offline and online PI tuning are used.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

The PI-online tuning gains using MLP-ANN for the ECE-15 drive cycles.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

The PI-online tuning gains using MLP-ANN for the custom IM240 drive cycle.

More »

Fig 19 Expand