Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

CMPMIT-ICD-10 scores.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Flowchart.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of characteristics between nonsurviving and surviving patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

AUCs and best cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the five scores.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparisons of areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves.

A ROC curves for predicting in-hospital mortality. B Pairwise comparisons of the AUCs among the five scores.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the five scores for in-hospital mortality at their respective best cutoff values.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Logistic regression analyses for the predictive value of the CMPMIT-ICD-10 score, APACHE II score, SOFA score, ISS, and AIS score.

More »

Table 4 Expand