Fig 1.
Schematic diagram of the study area.
Table 1.
The sources of data.
Fig 2.
Land use changes in the study area from 1990 to 2020.
Fig 3.
Study method flowchart.
Table 2.
Construction of ecological sensitivity evaluation index system and indicator weights for the study area.
Table 3.
Summary of Consistency Check Results.
Table 4.
Ecological Sensitivity Factor Grading Criteria.
Table 5.
Single land use dynamic index in the West Coast New Area.
Fig 4.
Changes in Land Use Area (1990–2020).
Fig 5.
Comprehensive Land Use Dynamic Index.
Table 6.
Land use area of each period in the study area from 1990 to 2020 (ha).
Table 7.
Land use type transfer matrix in the Study Area from 1990 to 2000 (ha).
Fig 6.
Land Use Transition Chord Diagram in the Study Area from 1990 to 2020.
Table 8.
Land use type transfer matrix in the Study Area from 2000 to 2010(ha).
Table 9.
Land use type transfer matrix in the Study Area from 2010 to 2020(ha).
Fig 7.
Spatial distribution of single-factor ecological sensitivity levels in the study area.
Table 10.
Comprehensive Ecological Sensitivity Grading Criteria of the study area.
Fig 8.
Spatial distribution of integrated ecological sensitivity levels in the study area from 1990 to 2020.
Table 11.
Area of each sensitive area in different years and the proportion of the study area from1990 to 2020(ha).
Table 12.
Neighborhood Weights.
Table 13.
2020 Actual vs Simulated Area (ha).
Fig 9.
Driving Factors.
Fig 10.
Actual Land Use Data (2020) vs. Simulated Land Use Data (2020).
Table 14.
Neighborhood Weights.
Table 15.
Prediction of Land Use Areas in 2030 Under Different Development Scenarios (ha).
Fig 11.
Atlas of Development Probability for Different Land Use Types.
Fig 12.
Land Use Simulation Under Natural Development, Urban Development, and Ecological Protection Scenarios in 2030.
Fig 13.
Ecological Sensitivity Assessment Maps for Three Different Scenarios.
Table 16.
Area and Percentage of Each Ecological Sensitivity Zone Under Three Different Scenarios (ha).