Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Data modalities in healthcare.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Traditional data fusion.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The proposed FKG-MM framework.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

FKG-MM for diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy diseases.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

FKG of 6 fuzzy rules [65].

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

An illustration of 6 fuzzy rules [23].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

FRB consists of 14 fuzzy rules [65].

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

FKGS consists of 5 fuzzy rules [65].

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Heatmap tabular feature.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Heatmap image feature.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Feature importance chart.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 4.

Performance evaluation metrics.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Feature selection method with sampling ratio of 15% and error threshold of 0.2.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Feature selection method with sampling ratio of 15% and error threshold of 0.3.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Feature selection method with sampling ratio 20% and error threshold 0.2.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Feature selection method with sampling ratio 20% and error threshold 0.3.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Comparison of accuracy.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 9.

ANOVA results for accuracy.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

FKG-MM results with sampling ratio of 15% and error threshold of 0.2.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 10.

Confusion matrix of Feature Selection method with sample rate 20% and error threshold 0.3.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 11.

FKG-MM results with sampling ratio of 15% and error threshold of 0.3.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

FKG-MM results with sampling ratio of 20% and error threshold of 0.2.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

FKG-MM results with sampling ratio of 20% and error threshold of 0.3.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

ANOVA results for accuracy.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

ANOVA results for total time.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Tukey HSD results for accuracy.

More »

Table 16 Expand

Table 17.

Tukey HSD results for total time.

More »

Table 17 Expand