Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of sequencing data processing steps for nematode and faecal samples.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Pie chart illustrating the relative abundance of microbial composition at the phylum level identified in both faecal (A) and nematode (B) samples, facilitating a comparative analysis of microbial community structures across the two biomes.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Stacked bar chart illustrating the relative abundance of microbial composition at the phylum (A), class (B), and family (C) levels identified in both faecal and nematode samples at individual level.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Phyla, classes, families and genera significantly differing between faeces and nematodes, identified through LEfSe analysis and ranked according to their LDA score.

Red color: more represented in faeces, blue color more represented in nematodes (less represented in faeces).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Alpha diversity findings between biome (host faeces and nematodes), nematode subfamilies (Cyathostominae and Strongylinae), nematode sex (male vs. female), and intestinal sampling location (caecum vs. ventral colon).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Beta diversity at feature level between biome (host faeces and nematodes), nematode subfamilies (Cyathostominae and Strongylinae), nematode sex (male vs. female), and intestinal sampling location (caecum vs. ventral colon).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Box-plot chart of alpha diversity according with the Chao1, Shannon and Simpson in faeces and nematodes samples.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Three-dimensional representation of beta diversity between faeces and nematodes, visualized using PCoA based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index and PERMANOVA statistics.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The heat tree analysis highlighting the hierarchical structure of taxonomic classifications to quantitatively (using the median abundance) and statistically (using the non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank Sum test) depict taxonomic differences between microbial communities.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Stacked bar chart illustrating the relative abundance of microbial communities at the phylum (A) and class (B) levels, identified in faeces and in nematodes collected from the caecum and ventral colon at the individual level.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The heat tree analysis highlighting the hierarchical structure of taxonomic classifications to quantitatively (using the median abundance) and statistically (using the non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank Sum test) depict taxonomic differences between microbial communities.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Heatmap showing the core microbiome of faeces (A) and nematodes (B) at the phylum and class levels.

Colours ranging from blue to brick red indicate prevalence above specific relative abundance thresholds, as indicated on the x-axis for each taxon listed on the y-axis.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 4.

Correlation network values at the phylum level.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Examples of ecological interpretations of significant correlations among microbial taxa associated with faeces and nematodes, indicating potential symbiotic, antagonistic, or selective relationships.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 10.

Correlation network analysis.

Nodes represent bacterial taxa at the phylum (A) and class (B) levels and are depicted as pie charts, showing relative abundance across faecal (green) and nematode-associated (orange) microbiomes. Edges indicate correlations: red lines represent positive associations; blue lines indicate negative correlations. Only significant correlations were retained for network visualization.

More »

Fig 10 Expand