Fig 1.
STROBE flow diagram of participant recruitment and follow-up.
The participant recruitment and follow-up process involved 380 potential participants: 9 excluded at screening, 371 enrolled at baseline (T1), and 297 remained for final analysis after follow-up exclusions (27 at T2, 28 at T3, 19 at T4).
Table 1.
Model fit indices for one to five exercise self-efficacy trajectories.
Table 2.
Parameter estimation results of the latent class growth model for exercise self-efficacy.
Table 3.
Multiple comparisons of the trajectory classes of exercise self-efficacy over time.
Fig 2.
Three latent classes of exercise self-efficacy trajectories in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
This figure illustrates the development of exercise self-efficacy over four time points (T1 to T4) across three latent classes: Class 1 (22%, Low-Efficacy Decline Group), Class 2 (34%, High-Efficacy Ascending-Stable Group), and Class 3 (44%, Moderate-Efficacy Continuous Increase Group). Error bars represent standard errors.
Table 4.
Comparison of baseline characteristics among different self-efficacy trajectories (n = 297).
Table 5.
Multinomial logistics regression analysis of exercise self-efficacy.