Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Human-mosquito transmission dynamics of dengue fever.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Compartmental model structure for dengue transmission dynamics.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Description of epidemiological parameters in the compartmental model.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

NPC workflow.

In S1 Fig, we provide an illustration of the complete neural network model, including the input, hidden, and output layers.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Selected calibration and projection dengue outbreaks from city data.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Selected calibration and projection dengue outbreaks from country data.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

NPC vs MCMC accuracy and processing time on city data.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of NPC and MCMC: MSE and processing time on city data.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of NPC and MCMC accuracy for infectious (Hi) and cumulative infectious () compartments on city data.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison of NPC and MCMC for marginal posterior densities of ECM parameter set on city data.

The plot shows marginal posterior distributions for parameters in α after calibration in Bello, Iquitos, and San Juan. The x-axis gives parameter values and the y-axis gives posterior density. Narrow, sharp peaks indicate higher certainty, while broader shapes indicate greater uncertainty. Comparing these distributions across NPC and MCMC highlights differences in parameter uncertainty and estimation values.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for basic reproductive number on city data.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

NPC vs MCMC accuracy and processing time on country data.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of NPC and MCMC: MSE and Processing Time on Country Data

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison of NPC and MCMC accuracy for infectious (Hi) and cumulative infectious () compartments on country data.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison of NPC and MCMC for marginal posterior densities of ECM parameter set on country data.

The plot shows marginal posterior distributions for parameters in α after calibration in Vietnam, the Philippines, and Cambodia. The x-axis gives parameter values and the y-axis gives posterior density. Narrow, sharp peaks indicate higher certainty, while broader shapes indicate greater uncertainty. Comparing these distributions across NPC and MCMC highlights differences in parameter uncertainty and estimation values.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for basic reproductive number on country data.

More »

Fig 13 Expand