Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Hydraulic-mechanical specific energy model and optimization flow diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Drilling Data Table for the 455m - 465m Interval of Well Zhanghai A.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Drilling Data Table for the 3695m-3705m Interval of Well Zhanghai A.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Data Table for Imputing Missing Values of Weight on Bit Using Random Forest (455-465m).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Data Table for Imputing Missing Rotary Speed Values Using Random Forest (3695-3705m).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Data Table of Abnormal Weight on Bit for Well Zhanghai A (833-840m).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Data Table of Abnormal Weight on Bit for Well Zhanghai A (3095 - 3105m).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 2.

a) Outlier Detection Performance of the 3σ Method; b) Outlier Detection Performance of the K-means Method; c)Outlier Detection Performance of the LOF Method (Black is the standard value, red is the abnormal value).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 7.

Data Table After S-G Filter Processing (833 - 840m).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Data Table After S-G Filter Processing (3095 - 3105m).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 10.

Drilling Parameters After Processing (Part of Well Zhanghai A).

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 9.

On-site Drilling Parameters (Part of Well Zhanghai A).

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of Raw Data and Processed Data for Well Zhanghai A.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of Raw Data and Processed Data from Well Zhanghai B.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of Raw Data and Processed Data from Well Zhanghai C.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of Raw Data and Processed Data from Well Zhanghai D.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The RMSE comparison diagram of the original and processed data.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 11.

Summary of Fitting Parameters for the Ternary Model.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 8.

Field Rate of Penetration (ROP) and the Corresponding Prediction Results of the Ternary Model; a) Well Zhanghai A; b)Well Zhanghai C; c)Well Zhanghai C; d)Well Zhanghai D.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 12.

Training Data for Well Zhanghai A (Partial).

More »

Table 12 Expand

Fig 9.

Regression Analysis of the Sample Set in the BP Neural Network.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Prediction Performance of Rate of Penetration (ROP) for Well Zhanghai A.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Prediction Performance of Rate of Penetration (ROP) for Well Zhanghai B.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Prediction Performance of Rate of Penetration (ROP) for Well Zhanghai C.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Prediction Performance of Rate of Penetration (ROP) for Well Zhanghai D.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 13.

Evaluation Indicators for the BP Neural Network Model.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

Comparison of Prediction Accuracy.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Table 15.

Lithology Table for Part of the Strata in Well Zhanghai A.

More »

Table 15 Expand

Table 16.

Lithology Table for Part of the Strata in Well Zhanghai B.

More »

Table 16 Expand

Fig 14.

Mechanical Specific Energy Baseline; a) Well Zhanghai A; b) Well Zhanghai B.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 17.

Data Table for Correlation Analysis (Partial).

More »

Table 17 Expand

Fig 15.

Correlation Analysis of Parameters in Drilling Data.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 18.

Sensitivity Analysis of Weight on Bit (WOB) to Mechanical Specific Energy and Field Drilling Data.

More »

Table 18 Expand

Fig 16.

Variation Curve of Mechanical Specific Energy with Rate of Penetration (ROP) under Different Weight on Bit (WOB) Conditions.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Variation Curve of Mechanical Specific Energy with Rate of Penetration (ROP) under Different Weight on Bit (WOB) Conditions.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 19.

Sensitivity Analysis of Rotational Speed on Mechanical Specific Energy.

More »

Table 19 Expand

Fig 18.

Variation Curve of Mechanical Specific Energy with Rate of Penetration (ROP) at Different Rotational Speeds.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 20.

Sensitivity Analysis of Flow Rate on Mechanical Specific Energy.

More »

Table 20 Expand

Fig 19.

Curves Depicting the Relationship Between Mechanical Specific Energy and Rate of Penetration (ROP) at Different Flow Rates.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Corresponding Curve of Rate of Penetration (ROP) versus Mechanical Specific Energy (MSE) in the Case of Bit Balling.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Table 21.

Partial Parameter Values for the Mechanical Specific Energy Model.

More »

Table 21 Expand

Table 22.

Predicted Values of Rate of Penetration (ROP) for Well Zhanghai A (Partial).

More »

Table 22 Expand

Fig 21.

Limit Values of Parameters for Well Zhanghai A.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Table 23.

Parameter Constraint Conditions.

More »

Table 23 Expand

Fig 22.

Optimization Results of Drilling Parameters.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Table 24.

Lithology Table of Well Zhanghai A-1 Formation.

More »

Table 24 Expand

Fig 23.

Illustration of the Sliding Window Concept.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Table 25.

Sliding window quantitative data.

More »

Table 25 Expand

Fig 24.

Application Effect Diagram of Adjacent Wells.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Comparison Chart of Transmission Efficiency.

More »

Fig 25 Expand