Table 1.
Overview of cohorts.
Fig 1.
Heatmaps showing the most common comorbidities for the respective databases.
Note: Every number lower than 15 has been changed to 0 due to privacy considerations
Fig 2.
Histograms showing the proportion of patients in different age spans across wound types and sex.
The area per sex and wound type sums to 1.0. Bars corresponding to less than 15 patients have been changed to 0 due to privacy considerations.
Table 2.
Data content comparison for patient data.
Table 3.
Data content comparison for wound data.
Fig 3.
A fictional example of a what is typically being captured with regards to Patient and Wound Journey in the respective databases.
Fig 4.
Wound classification tree for the Wound Monitor database.
The categories traumatic wounds, infected and surgical wounds were originally part of the same category while burns were a category of their own. Discussions with clinicians lead to the structure seen in the figure.
Fig 5.
Wound classification tree for the RHIP Wound Cohort.