Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Two synergistic schemes for dust removal.

(a) Scheme Ⅰ: acoustic pretreatment + high-pressure spray; (b) Scheme Ⅱ: ultrafine droplet nucleation + acoustic agglomeration + high-pressure spray.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for acoustic-spray synergistic dust removal.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Particle size distribution of the experimental coal dust.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Spray angle for three nozzle orifice sizes.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Droplet size distribution in high-pressure water spray.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Experimental parameters for experimental Scheme I.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Experimental parameters for experimental Scheme II.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

Numerical simulation model for particle-droplet interaction dynamics in a standing-wave acoustic field.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Parameter values for numerical calculation.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Dust removal efficiency as a function of nozzle orifice diameter.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Dust removal efficiency as a function of acoustic power.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Dust removal efficiency as a function of air velocity.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Removal efficiency as a function of coal dust particle size at different air velocities.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Trajectories of dust particles under different ultrasonic energy densities.

(a-1) dp = 2.5 μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (a-2) dp = 2.5 μm, Eac = 5J/m3; (a-3) dp = 2.5 μm, Eac = 10 J/m3; (b-1) dp = 10μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (b-2) dp = 10 μm, Eac = 5 J/m3; (b-3) dp = 10 μm, Eac = 10J/m3.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Spatial distribution of dust particles at different ultrasonic energy densities.

(a-1) dp = 2.5 μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (a-2) dp = 2.5μm,Eac = 5J/m3 (a-3) dp = 2.5μm,Eac = 10J/m3; (b-1) dp = 10μm, Eac = 0.5J/m3; (b-2) dp = 10μm,Eac = 5J/m3; (b-3) dp = 10 μm, Eac = 10J/m3.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Evolution of particle concentration distribution along the flow direction.

(a) dp = 2.5 μm, Eac = 5 J/m3; (b) dp = 2.5 μm, Eac = 10 J/m3; (c) dp = 10 μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (d) dp = 10 μm, Eac = 10 J/m3.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Trajectories of droplets under different ultrasonic energy densities.

(a-1) dw = 10 μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (a-2) dw = 10 μm, Eac = 5J/m3; (a-3) dw = 10 μm, Eac = 10 J/m3; (b-1) dw = 20 μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (b-2) dw = 20 μm, Eac = 5 J/m3; (b-3) dw = 20 μm, Eac = 10 J/m3; (c-1) dw = 50 μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (c-2) dw = 50 μm, Eac = 5 J/m3; (c-3) dw = 50 μm, Eac = 10 J/m3.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Evolution of droplet concentration distributions.

(a) dw = 10 μm, Eac = 5 J/m3;(b) dw = 10 μm, Eac = 2.5 J/m3; (c) dw = 20 μm, Eac = 0.5 J/m3; (d) dw = 20 μm, Eac = 10 J/m3.

More »

Fig 15 Expand