Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Shear surface modeling by Merchant M. E. [2,6].

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Kita Y. Slip line field [12].

More »

Fig 2 Expand

More »

Expand

Fig 3.

Large negative leading angle slip line modeled by Fang [15].

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Slip line modeled by Ozturk S [16].

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Slip line field modeling of rounded edge contact and rounded edge-rake face contact.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Schematic diagram of the Cauchy and Riemann problems.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Plot of function f(α) versus ultimate stress σb (Damage Line).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Plot of function f(α) versus ultimate stress σb(Damage Band).

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Calculation process for secondary development of the slip line field.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 1.

Three factors and four levels of orthogonal cutting simulation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Initial parameters of the J-C model for TC4Alloy [29].

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 10.

2D simulation post-processing (maximum stress state).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Cutting experiment.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 3.

Experimental devices and models.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 12.

Post-simulation processing of stagnation points (different rake angles).

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 4.

Theoretical coordinates of the diversion point (effect of Rake angle).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 13.

Diversion points (different Blunt radius of the tip).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 5.

Theoretical coordinates of the stagnation point (effect of the Rounded edge).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 14.

Stagnation point (different feeds).

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 6.

Theoretical coordinates of the stagnation point (effect of different feeds).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 15.

Distribution of stagnation points at different rake angles.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Distribution of stagnation points for different rounded edge.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Distribution of stagnation points at Different Feeds.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Dead metal zone morphology for different cutting parameters.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Dead metal zones for different rake angles.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Table 7.

Dead metal zone parameters at different rake angles.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 20.

Dead metal zone for different blunt radii of the tooltip.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Table 8.

Dead metal zone parameters for a different rounded edge.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 21.

Dead metal zone for different feeds.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Table 9.

Dead metal zone parameters at different feeds.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 22.

Slip line field for different rake angles.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Slipline field with different depths of cut (a) Slipline field; (b) Slipline in the third deformation zone.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Slip line field for different rounded edge radius.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Dead metal zone in the slip line field.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

Schematic diagrams for different cutting conditions: (a) rounded edge contact condition (b) rounded edge-rake face contact condition (c) steady state cutting condition.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Fig 27.

Slip line field analysis for different rake angles: (a) Slip line field with 10° rake angle (b) Slip line field with 15° rake angle.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Fig 28.

Slip line field analysis during steady-state cutting.

More »

Fig 28 Expand