Table 1.
Perceived influence on compliance of main compliance mechanisms (lay understanding measures).
Table 2.
Preference for policies leveraging main compliance mechanisms to promote compliance (policy preference measures).
Table 3.
Empirical understanding of compliance: Means and standard deviations of dependent and independent variables for empirical analysis of mechanisms shaping compliance.
Table 4.
Lay understanding of compliance: Perceived associations of compliance mechanisms with compliance according to lay participants.
Table 5.
Empirical understanding of compliance: Observed associations (bivariate correlations) of compliance mechanisms with compliance according to empirical analysis.
Fig 1.
Comparing lay and empirical understanding of compliance: Observed empirical associations (absolute correlations) of compliance mechanisms with compliance versus (aggregated) perceived associations with compliance according to lay participants.
Fig 2.
Comparing lay and empirical understanding of compliance: Observed empirical associations (absolute correlations) of compliance mechanisms with compliance versus (aggregated) perceived associations with compliance according to lay participants (lay understanding).
Table 6.
Lay understanding of compliance: Preference for policies leveraging main compliance mechanisms to promote compliance.
Fig 3.
Comparing lay understanding and policy preference: (Aggregated) perceived associations of mechanisms with compliance according to lay participants versus (aggregated) preference for policies to promote compliance.
Fig 4.
(Aggregated) preference for policies to promote compliance versus (aggregated) perceived effectiveness for promoting compliance (lay understanding).
Table 7.
Comparing lay understanding and policy preference: Observed associations (bivariate correlations) between perceived (lay) association of mechanism with compliance and preference for policy to promote compliance.