Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Conceptual Framework.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Scale and item sources.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Demographic Profile.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Common method biased (CMB) test.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Construct’s validity and reliability test.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Discriminant validity test.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Model fitness test.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

R-square test.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

f-square test.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Hypothesis test.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 2.

Model resolution by PLS bootstrapping.

The statistical significance of the p-value with all six hypotheses (H1 through H6) is accepted, H1 (WoM → CP) shows strong positive relationship with value of 0.269 as well as relatively high value of p value (p < 0.001) signifying word of mouth communication is significantly affecting the consumer perception. The constructs content characteristics (β = 0.152, p < 0.05), consumer trust (β = 0.207, p < 0.05), emotional connection (β = 0.170, p < 0.05), brand awareness (β = 0.200, p < 0.001) are characterized with positive significant effects. What is more, Hypothesis H6 that links consumer perception to purchase intent presents a strong and significant effect (β = 0.561, p < 0.001). This demonstrates the role of consumer perception in shaping purchase intent. The results strongly support the proposed model in that all hypothesized relationships are significant and have a substantial effect on the dependent variables.

More »

Fig 2 Expand