Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Outline of the framework that the software follows.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic visualisation of the 21-node Euler-Bernoulli beam with excitation at the free tip.

Readings are taken from Node 21.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Schematic visualisation of the bar system with clamps and excitation forces.

Readings are taken from Node 71.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Schematic visualisation of the 20-node Euler-Bernoulli beam with excitation from the middle and friction contact element at the free tip.

Readings are taken from Node 19.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Frequency response of the cantilever Timoshenko beam subjected to large displacements, showing displacement amplitudes for different excitation force levels (Readings are taken from the free tip and units in rad/s for frequency and m for displacement).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Frequency response of the bar with frictional clamps for different levels of imposed strain (Readings are taken at the contact point of the beam and the clamps and units are nondimensionalised for frequency by dividing the frequency axis by the reference value of the first axial mode of a clamped-clamped beam and displacement by dividing the displacement amplitude values by the displacement amplitude imposed on the clamps).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Frequency response curves of the cantilever beam with a localised frictional contact at its free tip for .

The nonlinear contact element is applied at Node 20, producing stick–slip behaviour that alters the dynamic response relative to the linear reference case.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Frequency response curves of the cantilever beam with a localised frictional contact at its free tip for .

The nonlinear contact element is applied at Node 20, producing stick–slip behaviour that alters the dynamic response relative to the linear reference case.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Frequency response curves of the cantilever beam with a localised frictional contact at its free tip for .

The nonlinear contact element is applied at Node 20, producing stick–slip behaviour that alters the dynamic response relative to the linear reference case.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Frequency response curves of the cantilever beam with a localised frictional contact at its free tip for .

The nonlinear contact element is applied at Node 20, producing stick–slip behaviour that alters the dynamic response relative to the linear reference case.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Legend for the frequency response curve figures showing the different response types and analysis methods used in the cantilever beam with frictional contact study.

More »

Fig 11 Expand