Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of mechanical parameters between C50 concrete and jointed gneiss.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Schematic diagram of the test site and vibration measurement points.

(a) Schematic diagram of the test site. (b). Sensor layout.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Optimized experimental delay scheme for inter-hole delay time.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Optimized experimental delay scheme for inter-row delay time.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Peak particle velocity (PPV) and vibration reduction rate of different inter-hole delay schemes.

(a) Free face reverse PPV. (b) Decrease rate of free face reverse PPV. (c) Free face direction PPV. (d) Decrease rate of free face direction PPV.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Experimental fragmentation size for inter-hole delay.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Fragmentation statistics.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Plot of Swebrec fitted distribution function.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Peak particle velocity (PPV) and vibration reduction rate of different inter-row delay schemes.

(a) Free face reverse PPV. (b) Decrease rate of free face reverse PPV. (c) Free face direction PPV. (d) Decrease rate of free face direction PPV.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Free face reverse principal frequency diagram.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 5.

Experimental fragmentation size for inter-row delay.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 7.

Plot of Swebrec fitted distribution function.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

On-site bench blasting test site of the high-slope project.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 6.

Vibration reduction rate of the delay time optimization groups (tk = 38 ms, tp = 68 ms) relative to the original engineering groups (tk = tp = 13 ms).

More »

Table 6 Expand