Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Illustration of surgical revisions for swing segment steno-occlusion in radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula: (A) Interposition, (B) Patch angioplasty, (C) Transposition, (D) Proximalization (Blue: Cephalic vein, Dashed blue: Stenotic vein segment, Red: Radial artery, Dashed red: Omitted distal artery, Yellow: Patch, Gray: Interposition graft).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristic of patients who underwent swing segment revision of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Lesion characteristics of swing segment.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of patency rates among the entire cohort of patients across swing segment revision groups: endovascular revision vs surgical revision.

(A) Primary patency, (B) Assisted primary patency, and (C) Secondary patency are depicted. The endovascular revision group is shown as a dashed line and the surgical revision group as a solid line. Crosses (+) indicate censored observations, meaning that the patient’s patency status was not observed beyond that time point.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Factors associated with loss of primary patency in whole cohort.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Factors associated with loss of primary patency within subgroup of stenosis or occlusion.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of primary patency rates within the (A) occlusion arm and (B) stenosis arm between the two swing segment revision groups: endovascular revision group vs surgical revision group.

The endovascular revision group is shown as a dashed line and the surgical revision group as a solid line. Crosses (+) indicate censored observations, meaning that the patient’s patency status was not observed beyond that time point.

More »

Fig 3 Expand