Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Overview of the study area.

(1) Distribution of karst systems in the study area; (2) Temperature distribution in Geothermal Anomaly Zone 1; (3) Temperature distribution in Geothermal Anomaly Zone 2.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Temperature Variation with Depth in Investigation Boreholes CK1, CK2, and CK3.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Temperature Correction for Diurnal Variation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Surface feature-based temperature calibration.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Corrected results of shallow layer temperature measurement.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Modeling parameters determined from laboratory measurements and field test data.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Flow velocity versus equivalent diameter.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 3.

Geometric model and boundary condition setup for karst structures: (1) geometric model; (2) top boundary temperature condition; (3) temperature distribution across the pipe wall [34].

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Thermal Profiles and Differences Between Karst and Non-Karst Structures.

(a) Comparison of temperature profiles between a karst structure at 50 m depth and and non-karst formation; (b) temperature difference curve between karstic and non-karstic bodies at 2 m depth.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Inferring Karst Conduit Scale from Shallow Thermal Signals.

(a) Relationship between the maximum depth and equivalent diameter of the 13.45°C isotherm; (b) Variation of subsurface temperature at 2 m depth with karst equivalent diameter.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Temperature at 2 m depth as a function of equivalent karst diameter for a flow velocity of 0.269 m/s.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Temperature difference curve at 2m depth: karst vs. non-karst under various fluid temperatures.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 6.

Estimated initial parameter values of karst structures for each survey line.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 8.

Spatial distribution of estimated geothermal temperature along various survey lines in Low-Temperature Anomaly Zone 1 derived by parameter estimation.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The spatial distribution of geothermal isotherms derived from parameter estimation across all survey lines in Low-Temperature Anomaly Zone 2.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Temperature Profile Fitting and Inferred Karst Conduits in Anomaly Zone 1.

(a) the fitting results of four 2m-depth temperature profiles in Low-Temperature Anomaly Zone 1; (b) potential karst channel locations inferred based on temperature profiles.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Temperature Profile Fitting and Inferred Karst Conduits in Anomaly Zone 2.

(a) The fitting results of three 2m-depth temperature profiles in Low-Temperature Anomaly Zone 2; (b) potential karst channel locations inferred based on temperature profiles.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 7.

Burial depth and flow radius of karst structures from different survey lines.

More »

Table 7 Expand