Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study participants who participated in the home visit pilot study with vaginal swab and stool sample self-collection.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Distribution of self-reported comfort levels with the collection process for stool (N = 43) and vaginal swab (N = 47) samples.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Stool sample and vaginal swab microbiome diversity profiles according to histology type (endometrioid vs. non-endometrioid): a. alpha diversity (Shannon index) for stool sample microbiome; b. beta diversity (Bray-Curtis) for stool sample microbiome; c. alpha diversity (Shannon index) for vaginal swab microbiome; d. beta diversity (Bray-Curtis) for vaginal swab microbiome.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Stool sample and vaginal swab microbiome diversity profiles according to cancer treatment (any chemotherapy/radiation vs. surgery only): a. alpha diversity (Shannon index) for stool sample microbiome; b. beta diversity (Bray-Curtis) for stool sample microbiome; c. alpha diversity (Shannon index) for vaginal swab microbiome; d. beta diversity (Bray-Curtis) for vaginal swab microbiome.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of the vaginal microbiome study samples by vagitype (N = 40).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Relative abundance of vaginal microbiome genera by vagitype (Lactobacillus dominant vs. non-Lactobacillus dominant vagitypes).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Volcano plot of differentially abundant bacterial genera in vaginal microbiome according to cancer treatment (any chemotherapy/radiation vs. surgery only).

More »

Fig 5 Expand