Fig 1.
The location of the Țării Crișurilor Museum in Oradea Municipality, Romania (Satellite imagery source: USGS EarthExplorer, ESRI World Imagery).
Fig 2.
Diagram representing the work stages and methods used to achieve this objective from a scientific point of view.
Fig 3.
Spatial distribution of datalogger measurement devices and data collection points at the level of the three analyzed rooms inside Țării Crișurilor Museum.
Table 1.
The devices used for data acquisition, along with their technical specifications and usage methodology.
Fig 4.
Risk levels associated with the internal microclimate based on the HMRE and HMRH indices, according to the model proposed by Fabbri and Bonora [42].
Fig 5.
Values obtained for the 10 indicators of the IAQ for the conservation of exhibits and ensuring human health.
Fig 6.
Spatial distribution of the average values of the indicators measured at the level of the three rooms in the study.
(a – spatial distribution of PM2.5; b – spatial distribution of PM10; c – spatial distribution of luminosity).
Table 2.
Thresholds and ranges recommended by the international standards in force used for calculating HMRE and HMRH values.
Table 3.
The results obtained from the application of the HMRE indicator within the three analysed rooms of the Țării Crișurilor Museum.
Table 4.
The results obtained following the application of the HMRH indicator within the three analysed rooms of the Țării Crișurilor Museum.
Fig 7.
Values obtained for each pollutant considered for the construction of HMRH within EH1-2 and EH 3.
Table 5.
Aerobic bacterial count. Colony-forming units (CFU) per gram of sample.
Fig 8.
Visual microbiological analysis of the six samples, before treatment, immediately after application of AgNPs and 30 days after treatment.
Fig 9.
Fungal growth on samples 4, 5 and 6.