Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The flowchart of the INFO algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of the ARINFO algorithm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Exploration vs exploitation analysis of ARINFO, INFO, and ARO algorithms.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Wind and solar plants data- IEEE −57 bus system [23].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Convergence curves of the ARINFO algorithm for the three best-performing runs.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Simulation results for Case 1.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Voltage profile of load buses.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Voltage profiles of generator buses.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Convergence performance comparison for Case 1.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Optimal scheduled active power outputs of all generators under different reserve cost coefficients.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Impact of varying reserve cost coefficients on individual cost components.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Optimal scheduled active power outputs of all generators under different penalty cost coefficients.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Impact of varying penalty cost coefficients on individual cost components.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Scheduled reactive power outputs of all generators in Cases 1, 2, and 3.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Voltage profiles of generator buses in Cases 1, 2, and 3.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 11.

Optimal settings of control variables for Case 11 using the ARINFO algorithm.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 3.

Simulation outcomes for Case 4.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 14.

Convergence performance comparison for Case 4.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 4.

Simulation outcomes for Case 5.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 15.

Convergence performance comparison for Case 5.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 5.

Simulation outcomes for Case 6.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 16.

Convergence performance comparison for Case 6.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Load bus voltage profiles of the IEEE 30-bus power system in Cases 1, 4, 5, and 6 using the ARINFO optimization algorithm.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Table 6.

Simulation outcomes for Case 7.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 18.

Comparative convergence performance for Case 7.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Comparative analysis of total generation costs in Cases 1, 4, and 7.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Table 7.

Mean values and probabilities of different loading scenarios [47].

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Simulation outcomes for Case 8.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 20.

Total cost under versus loading scenarios.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Impact of loading level on voltage deviation, power losses, and carbon emissions.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Voltages of the load buses during the 4 loading scenarios.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Table 9.

Simulation outcomes for Case 9.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 23.

Comparative convergence performance for Case 9.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Voltages of the load buses of the modified IEEE-57 bus power system.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Table 10.

Simulation outcomes for Case 10.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 25.

Comparative convergence performance for Case 10.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

Voltages of the load buses of the modified IEEE-57 bus power system.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Fig 27.

Voltages of the load buses of the IEEE-118 bus power system.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Fig 28.

Comparative convergence performance for Case 11.

More »

Fig 28 Expand