Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic diagram of the five categories of the positional relationship between the subject and the X-ray detector.

As shown in the figure, the video field of view only includes the chest radiography X-ray detector panel and its immediate vicinity, and is categorized into five classes based on its status(from left to right, the detector states are: “No one”, “Others”,”Too High”,”Too Low” and “Suitable”).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Image Preprocessing and Data Allocation Flowchart.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Training Process for Two Types of Convolutional Neural Networks and AI Models.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Grad-CAM heatmaps generated for each test example in Model A (fold 4) and Model B (fold 1) compared with the original images (from top to bottom, each row corresponds to the detector states: “Too High”,”Too Low”, “Suitable”,”No one” and “Others”).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Accuracy and loss function values for the validation set corresponding to each model fold.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Derivative metrics from confusion matrices generated from the test set for each model fold.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Derivative metrics from confusion matrices and McNemar’s test results for each category test in Model A (fold 4)and Model B (fold 1).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Confusion matrix visualizations generated for each category test in Model A (fold 4)and Model B (fold 1).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

ROC curves generated for each category test in Model A (fold 4)and Model B (fold 1).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Calibration curves and Brier scores generated for each category test in Model A (fold 4)and Model B (fold 1).

More »

Fig 7 Expand