Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Dimensions of variation in Czech.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Example of an experimental trial.

The questions under the two texts can be translated as: Which text reads more easily? Which text is written by a human? How confident are you in your answer?

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Example of feedback after a correct answer.

The texts at the top say ‘Generated by AI’ and ‘Written by human’, and the text in the green window at the bottom says ‘Correct!’

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The distribution of the correctness of the answers.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Feedback group: Mixed effects logistic regression results with estimates, confidence intervals, exponentiated coefficients, and significance levels.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

No-feedback group: Mixed effects logistic regression results with estimates, confidence intervals, exponentiated coefficients, and significance levels.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The dependency of correctness on trial order.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The dependency of correctness on confidence.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The dependency of reaction time on confidence.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The dependency of confidence on trial order.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The distribution of the readability.

The charts shows the frequency at which a human written text is considered more readable.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The distribution of the readability.

The charts shows the frequency at which the text that is considered more readable is also considered to be written by a human.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Correctness by Feedback and Readability.

When participants considered the human written text to be more readable, they were more likely to assing them correctly as human written.

More »

Fig 10 Expand