Fig 1.
Overview of the integrated hybrid analysis framework applied in this study.
Table 1.
Overview of the analytical methods used in this study.
Table 2.
Data of the measurement related to graft incompatibility of the ‘0900 Ziraat’ cultivar grafted onto different rootstock candidates.
Fig 2.
Grafting development on variety/rootstock combinations after 12 months. (A and E):08 K 056/0900 Ziraat, (B and F):55 K 104/Lambert, (C and G): 55 V 004/0900 Ziraat, (D and H): Gisela 6/0900 Ziraat.
Fig 3.
Shoot development in variety/rootstock combinations . (A and D):08 K 056/0900 Ziraat, (B and E):55 K 104/Lambert, (C and F): 55 V 004/0900 Ziraat.
Table 3.
Data of the measurement related to graft incompatibility of the ‘Lambert’ cultivar grafted onto different rootstock candidates.
Fig 4.
Two dimensional biplot obtained from Principal Component Analysis (PCA) followed by K-Means clustering based on all normalized trait variables.
Fig 5.
Feature importance rankings derived from random forest model.
Fig 6.
SHAP summary plot showing trait-wise contribution to compatibility score.
Fig 7.
SHAP dependence plot for bud growth rate, colored by callus formation.
Table 4.
Bayesian posterior summary of trait effects on compatibility score.
Table 5.
Posterior estimates and ranking probabilities of genotypes based on Bayesian modeling.