Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Mean and SD (or median and interquartile range) for all physical function assessments performed for each of the three trials by the 19 participants. P-values reflect results from one-way repeated measures ANOVA assessing differences across trials.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Test-retest reliability and interpretation for all physical function assessments between trial 1 and trial 2, and between trial 2 and trial 3. Interpretation of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values were based on classifications of poor (ICC < 0.5), moderate (0.5–0.75), good (0.75–0.9), or excellent (>0.9) [23].

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Bland-Altman plots of differences in test scores between repeated testing occasions (session 1 minus session 2, and session 3 minus session 2) vs. averages of paired measurements for the five-times STS (5-STS) test (panels A and B), 30-second STS (30-STS) test (panels C and D), single-leg balance (panels E and F), four-square step test (FSST; panels G and H), and total score for the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB; panels I and J).

The dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence interval of the mean difference between trials. Shaded areas indicate 95% limits of agreement.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Bland-Altman plots of differences in test scores between repeated testing occasions (session 1 minus session 2, and session 3 minus session 2) vs. averages of paired measurements for gait speed over 2.4 m at both usual (panels A and B) and fast speed (panels C and D), and gait speed over 4 m at both usual (panels E and F) and fast speed (panels G and H).

The dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence interval of the mean difference between trials. Shaded areas indicate 95% limits of agreement.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Barriers to remote physical function testing with older adults according to participants, including illustrative quotes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Barriers to remote physical function testing with older adults according to assessors, including illustrative quotes.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Enablers of remote physical function testing with older adults according to participants, including illustrative quotes.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Enablers of remote physical function testing with older adults according to assessors, including illustrative quotes.

More »

Table 6 Expand