Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comprehensive Researcher Development Framework (CRDF).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Comprehensive Researcher Development Framework Development Process.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Career stages addressed in included framework articles (N = 56).

Note that some articles addressed more than one career stage.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Research disciplines addressed in included framework articles (N = 56).

Note that some articles addressed more than one discipline.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Characteristics of National Survey Respondents (N = 169).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Percentage of 75 learning outcomes for which 50% or more of respondents selected each level of importance in response to the question “How important is achieving each learning outcome in your discipline?” (N = 123).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Learning Outcomes Rated as Extremely Important by 80% or More of Respondents.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Percentage of 79 learning outcomes for which 50% or more of respondents selected the career stage at which greatest gains were made. (N = 112).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

First and Second Round Card Sort Participant Characteristics.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Evolution of Area of Researcher Development Categories.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Phase 2 Card Sorting Results.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Original Framework Elements Mapped to Areas of Researcher Development.

More »

Table 7 Expand