Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Conceptual framework (Tab XYZ).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Functional architecture of Tab XYZ.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Automated Pairing Script.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Score Entry and Validation Script.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Automated Ranking and Tabulation Script.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Progression Automation Script.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Real-Time Result Generation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

System Maintenance and Error Handling Script.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 1.

Demography of Users.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 9.

Computer Literacy Levels of Users.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Level of User Experience with Conventional Web-based Tabulation Systems (Tabbycat).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

User Satisfaction Scores.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 2.

Comparative Analysis on Cost-Effectiveness between Tab XYZ and Conventional Web Applications.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 12.

Ease of Setting Up Debate Tabulation Systems.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 3.

Comparative Analysis on Data Security and Privacy between Tab XYZ and Tabbycat.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 13.

An instance of susceptibility of Web applications (Tabbycat).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Backend of a Web Application for Debate Tabulation (Tabbycat).

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

User-Friendly Rollback Options in Tab XYZ via Google Sheets.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Tab XYZ’s offline synchronization feature via Google Sheets.

More »

Fig 16 Expand