Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Acoustic features used in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Facial features used in the study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Histogram and density plots of the scores of the self-reported past and present valence divided by the cue words (“happy” and “sad”) for the emotional memories.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Model comparison of the best-fitting multimodal model, acoustic only, lexical only and facial only model of the self-reported past valence model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Model comparison of the best-fitting multimodal model, acoustic only, lexical only and facial only model of the self-reported present valence model.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Estimates of the fixed effects of the best-fitting model of the self-reported past valence; AIC = 886.48 with 622 observations (df = 603). Marginal R2 = 0.463.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Estimates of the fixed effects of the best-fitting model of the self-reported present valence data; AIC = 463.81 with 622 observations (df = 604). Marginal R2 = 0.281.

More »

Table 6 Expand