Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of recent Alzheimer’s classification studies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Proposed hybrid framework for Alzheimer’s disease classification.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Original dataset composition (Raw from ADNI).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Original 2D MRI views of the brain.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Gray matter segmented views of the brain.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

GM Mask image count after preprocessing.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance metrics of the standard U-Net (Vanilla U-Net) for the brain segmentation.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Visual comparison of Brain segmentation results.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Proposed Multi-Layer U-Net model for gray matter segmentation.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Architecture of Multi-Layer U-Net Model.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Proposed Alzheimer’s disease classification pipeline using Multi-Scale EfficientNet with SVM.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Architecture of Multi-EfficientNet.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 5.

SVM Hyperparameter Tuning Results Using Grid Search.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Details of Hyperparameters.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 9.

XAI Saliency map visualization for the proposed model.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 7.

Average Saliency Map Results.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparative evaluation of gray matter segmentation using Multi-Layer U-Net, Vanilla U-Net, Attention U-Net, and state-of-the-art methods. The results of the proposed model are calculated on the test set.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 10.

Gray matter segmentation results using the Attention U-Net model.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Gray Matter segmentation results using the proposed Multi-layer U-Net Model.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 9.

Class-wise performance on the test set.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 12.

Confusion Metrics: Presenting classification results on the test set.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 10.

Comparison of the Classification performance of the proposed model calculated on the test set with state-of-the-art Approaches.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Comparative performance analysis of different architectures.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Fig 13.

ROC curve for the proposed Classification model across AD, MCI, and CN.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 12.

Ablation Study Result.

More »

Table 12 Expand