Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic representation of the five-layer SPR sensor architecture showing BK7 prism, silver film, graphene monolayer, black phosphorus layer, and analyte medium with their respective thicknesses.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Step-by-step fabrication and integration process of the proposed five-layer SPR sensor, including substrate preparation, silver film deposition, graphene integration, black phosphorus layer fabrication, characterization, and final optical setup assembly.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Reflectance spectra of the graphene-based sensor for varying Ag thicknesses at analyte RIs from 1.29 to 1.38.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Reflectance spectra of the proposed sensor for analyte RI values from 1.29 to 1.38, showing variation with graphene thickness from 1 nm to 6 nm.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Dependence of peak reflectance on graphene thickness for different analyte RIs, illustrating enhanced sensor response at higher thicknesses.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Reflectance spectra of the proposed sensor for RIs 1.29–1.38 with varying Black Phosphorus thicknesses from 1.4 nm to 5.6 nm (steps of 1.2 nm).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Corresponding reflectance variation as a function of RI for each Black Phosphorus thickness, highlighting enhanced sensitivity at higher thicknesses.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

Showing the variation of sensor performance parameters with refractive index from 1.29 to 1.38 RIU.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 8.

Performance analysis of the proposed sensor as a function of refractive index.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

a–c. Electric field distribution of the proposed sensor at 65°, 80°, and 89°, showing maximum reflectance with strong brown field confinement at 80°, and minimum reflectance with dominant blue regions at 65° and 89°.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Scatter plot representation of KNN regression predictions versus true RI values (1.29–1.38 RIU), showing strong correlation with an optimum R2 score of 92%.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Heat map visualization of KNN regression performance across test cases (0.1–0.4), with R2 scores ranging from 93% to 100%, confirming robust predictive accuracy.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 2.

Comparative performance analysis of the proposed KNN regression model against other ML methods for RI variation prediction.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparative analysis of SPR sensor sensitivity for different enhancement strategies at λ = 633 nm.

More »

Table 3 Expand