Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Largest religion in each county by percentage of adherents according to the PRRI.

We construct the Confessional Adjacency matrix according to this data, by defining adjacency in terms of a shared dominant religious congregation.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Largest religion in each county by percentage of adherents according to the PRRI.

We construct the First Religion Confessional Adjacency matrix according to this data, by defining adjacency between counties if they share the same religion.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Second largest religion in each county by percentage of adherents according to the PRRI.

We construct the Second Religion Confessional Adjacency matrix according to this data, by defining adjacency between counties if they share the same religion.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Third largest religion in each county by percentage of adherents according to the PRRI.

We construct the Third Religion Confessional Adjacency matrix according to this data, by defining adjacency between counties if they share the same religion.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Fourth largest religion in each county by percentage of adherents according to the PRRI.

We construct the Fourth Religion Confessional Adjacency matrix according to this data, by defining adjacency between counties if they share the same religion.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Median household income by county according to data from the SAIPE.

We construct the Median Household Income Adjacency matrix according to this data, by defining adjacency between counties if they belong to the same income bracket.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Urbanization level by county according to the NCHS classification scheme.

We construct the Urbanization Level adjacency matrix according to this data, by defining adjacency between counties if they share the same urbanization level.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 1.

Moran’s I for 2016 Trump/Clinton vote share when taking into account Geographic, Confessional (1st (CHR), 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th majority religion), Median Household Income and Urbanization Level Adjacency.

First Religion (CHR) refers to the majority religion when grouping together all White Christian groups (see 1)

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Moran’s I for 2020 Trump/Biden vote share when taking into account Geographic, Confessional (1st (CHR), 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th majority religion), Median Household Income and Urbanization Level Adjacency.

First Religion (CHR) refers to the majority religion when grouping together all White Christian groups (see 1)

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Moran’s I for 2024 Trump/Harris vote share when taking into account Geographic, Confessional (1st (CHR), 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th majority religion), Median Household Income and Urbanization Level Adjacency.

First Religion (CHR) refers to the majority religion when grouping together all White Christian groups (see 1)

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 8.

Moran’s I for Republican share of total votes across US presidential elections, under different adjacency frameworks: Geographical, First Religion (CHR), First Religion, Second Religion, Third Religion, Fourth Religion, Median Income, Urbanization Level.

Time variance is minimal, order among adjacency types is preserved.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Moran’s I for Democratic share of total votes across US presidential elections, under different adjacency frameworks: Geographical, First Religion (CHR), First Religion, Second Religion, Third Religion, Fourth Religion, Median Income, Urbanization Level.

Time variance is minimal, order among adjacency types is preserved.

More »

Fig 9 Expand