Table 1.
Sample Characteristics (N = 228).
Table 2.
Model fit indices of TRA, TAM, and trimmed TAM.
Fig 1.
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA).
Note. d1 represents the disturbance (error) term for Behavioral Intention, accounting for the variance not explained by Attitude and Subjective Norms; d2 represents the disturbance term for Actual Use, accounting for the variance not explained by Behavioral Intention. The numbers at the top right corner of each box represent the percent variance explained by the prior predictors in the model. All path coefficients are standardized betas.
Fig 2.
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).
Note. d1 represents the disturbance (error) term for Attitude, representing variance not explained by Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use; d2 represents the disturbance term for Behavioral Intention, representing variance not explained by Attitude and Perceived Usefulness; d3 represents the disturbance term for Actual Use, representing variance not explained by Behavioral Intention. The numbers at the top right corner of each box represent the percent variance explained by the prior predictors in the model. All path coefficients are standardized betas.
Fig 3.
Note. d1 represents the disturbance (error) term for Attitude, representing variance not explained by Perceived Usefulness; d2 represents the disturbance term for Behavioral Intention, representing variance not explained by Attitude and Perceived Usefulness; d3 represents the disturbance term for Actual Use, representing variance not explained by Behavioral Intention. The numbers at the top right corner of each box represent the percent variance explained by the prior predictors in the model. All path coefficients are standardized betas.