Table 1.
Description of data used in mixed-methods analysis.
Table 2.
Overview of mixed methods approach.
Table 3.
Coding scheme used for qualitative analysis of interview data.
Table 4.
Outreach and engagement activities related to rockfish fisheries and management in Washington state.
Fig 1.
Directionality of information flow associated with outreach and engagement activities.
Information flow (left side) is characterized as one-way (outreach) or two-way (engagement) for various types of rockfish-related outreach and engagement activities discussed by interviewees (right side). The width of the bands is proportional to the frequency of coded text segments from interviews for which codes on the left co-occurred with codes on the right.
Table 5.
Social goals of public participation identified by interview participants as goals for rockfish-related outreach and engagement.
Fig 2.
Directionality of information flow associated with outreach and engagement goals.
Information flow (left side) is characterized as one-way (outreach) or two-way (engagement) for rockfish-related activities that addressed a range of goals discussed by interviewees (right side). The width of the bands is proportional to the frequency of coded text segments from interviews for which codes on the left co-occurred with codes on the right.
Fig 3.
Portfolio of rockfish-related outreach and engagement activities and the social goals of public participation in ESA-listed rockfish recovery that they addressed.
Outreach activities are in blue shaded cells and engagement activities are in green shaded cells, as identified from practitioner interviews and angler surveys. Social goals are arranged in order from most (left) to least (right) frequently identified goals of rockfish-related outreach and engagement by interview participants. Print and online materials include species identification guides and pamphlets; newsletters; and K-12 educational materials.